Get Permission Mukhopadhyay: Gender differentials in infant and under-five mortality in India


Introduction

The prime determinant of the health and well-being of a community is resonated by two most important indicators related to child health i.e. Infant mortality rate (IMR) and Under-five mortality rate (U5MR). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) promulgated them as indicators of proposed development for all the member nations. Overall, IMR and U5MR mirror the socioeconomic progression of a country including utilization of maternal and child health care (MCH) services. As a part of accomplishing the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) with implementation of various family welfare measures, India was able to reduce the IMR and U5MR to 32 and 37 per 1000 live births in 2018.1 During 1990 to 2015, female IMR declined from 81 to 39, while male IMR dropped from 78 to 35 in India; and that furthered to 32 and 33 for male and female IMR correspondingly in 2018 reported by Sample Registration System (SRS), India. 1 However, the gender gap in IMR lingers to persist thereafter although in shrinking mode; still making the presence relevant.

Males are often considered at higher risk of mortality and morbidity against their female complements during the complete span of human life.2, 3 Bigoted treatment of girls in some of the Asian countries reportedly reflected lower rates of IMR in male than the female infants.4 Newborn girls have advantageous biological survival than boys because they are less vulnerable to birth complications, infections, and congenital abnormalities. 5 This advantage, however, is annulled by the discriminatory care of the girls in some communities. As the child grows, the influence of socioeconomic and demographic variables on the child survival increases exposing the primal association between bio-demographics and child mortality.6

All countries of the South East Asia region, except India, has lower girl infant mortality compared to the boys.7 Studies reported that parent’s education, occupation, family income, types of wash-ups, and access to electricity had significant effects on child mortality. 8 WHO reiterated that the chance of survival of a child is strongly determined by the living conditions into which a child is born, brought up, nurtured, and nursed during illness. 9 Odds of compromised child-health is strongly related to remoteness of residences, rural dwellings, low educational status of parents, and marginalized subsistence due to poor socioeconomic position of the family. 10 Infant sex ratio in India has been favorable for males since 1980s. According to the Census 2011, infant sex ratio dropped by 8 counts, – from 927 in 2001 to 919 in 2011. The foremost reason of the descent in female births in India has been assumed to be the strong preference for male child in mediocre Indian families backed by technological advances in prenatal tests preventing birth of a girl child. 11

Novelty and justification

Besides the estimates of child mortality trends, information about sex-specific child mortality is desirable to monitor progress of SDGs, though the elucidation of pattern in the gender relative mortality is not simple. Newborn girls survive better than boys because they are less exposed to birth complications, infections, and congenital anomalies. Therefore, in early infancy, ratio of IMR among boys and girls is greater than one, provided both sexes have equal access to food, nutrition, general care, medical attention and treatment. During late infancy, boys and girls are equally susceptible to infections and communicable diseases, so the gender ratio of IMR during 3 months of age to 1 year is nearer to 1. Post-infancy in toddlerhood, although boys and girls are similarly prone to infections and accidents under the well-developed canopy of protective immunity and adaptability, yet the sex ratio of mortality in the 1–4-year age group is actually more than 1. Notably, with the improvement in living conditions in developing countries and advent of antibiotics, frequency of infectious diseases has declined; and therefore, the same no more bear high relevance as cause of mortality during childhood. Thus, in the absence of sex-specific differences in the health seeking behaviour, medical attention and treatment of children, the sex ratio of infant mortality (M:F) is expected to be greater than one considering biological superiority of girl children; and also, to increase further although overall under-five mortality rate in developing countries is likely to decrease.

This study is unique in its outline to check and compare sex specific IMR and U5MR during 2010 to 2016 in the background of demographic and socioeconomic stand of the communities and thereby monitor the progress in accomplishment of SDGs as recommended.

Aim

Striding through the trend, this endeavor aims to assess the gender disparities in infant and under-five mortality in India in the backdrop of certain socioeconomic and demographic factors.

Materials and Methods

Data from the fourth round of the National Family Health Survey (2015–16), and the Indian chapter of the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), USAID was used as the base-line information in this study. 12, 13 NFHS-4 is a nationally representative household survey conducted across the 29 states and 6 union territories of India. The key objectives of NFHS-4 are to provide state and district level estimates of fertility, mortality, family planning, maternal and child health indicators, and related factors. The household and individual response rates in NFHS-4 were 98 percent and 97 percent, respectively. The NFHS-4 is a cross-sectional study and was executed through a stratified multi-stage random sampling design. The rural sample was picked up through a two stage sampling with villages as the Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) at the first stage, followed by a random selection of 22 households in each PSU at the second stage. Two stage sample design was also applied in urban areas with Census Enumeration Blocks (CEBs) selected at the first stage and a random selection of 22 households in each CEB at the second stage.

In both the urban and rural areas during the second stage, households were selected after carrying out a comprehensive mapping, recording, and household listing with available residential address with prominent land-mark in the selected first-stage units for easy recognition purpose later. PSUs having less than 40 households were combined and pulled together in the closest PSU for sampling convenience.

In each stratum, six approximately equal substrata were created on the basis of the estimated number of households in each village – each having two sub-substrata on the basis of the percentage of the population belonging to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (SCs/STs) for equal representation of the member families of the community in the study sample. The women gave information on all the children they had within last five years preceding the survey including their survival status or otherwise. Socioeconomic, environmental, and demographic data was suitably collected either from the mother or from other family members as per convenience.

The outcome measures were IMR and U5MR during the study tenure. Infant mortality has been defined as the no. of death of infant per 1000 live birth in a defined geographical area in a particular year. Under five mortality is the death of a child aged between one to five year per 1000 live births in a defined geographical area in a specific year.

The NFHS-4 data rendered the socioeconomic and environment factors related to child health and survival. The present study considered factors such as current age of mother, mother’s age at the time of child birth, education of parents, occupation of parents, religion, social group, mass media exposure, birth order and interval, sex of the child, sanitation facility, safe toilet facility, safe drinking water facility, place of residence, and region of residence to ascertain their effect on child health. Studies recorded in the recent past that the data collected in NFHS-4 are of reasonably good quality; even very close to SRS and Health Management Information System (HMIS) estimates. 14, 15

The work is based on a secondary data from the NFHS-4 report with no identifiable information on the study subjects. NFHS-4 team obtained the consent before and during the survey. This dataset is available in the public domain for research use and, hence, no ethical approval was contemplated specifically for the present study.

Results

Estimated Male and female IMR & U5MR were noted according to various socio-demographic factors (Table 1), and it reflects that the male rate of mortality in infancy as well as under-five group has been significantly higher as compared to the female. Among all the factors, higher birth order, illiteracy, unemployed parents, and media exposure were found highly contributory.

Table 1

Estimated IMR and U5MR across parental demographic characteristics

Background Demographic Characteristics

Estimated IMR per 1000 live births

Estimated U5MR per 1000 live birth

Sample Size

Significance

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

IMR

U5MR

Current Mother’s age

15–24

49.5

40.4

57.3

49.8

43,738

40,712

p 0.05

p 0.05

25–34

38.7

33.7

49.1

44.5

77,951

70,764

35–49

52.6

51.3

68.1

68.6

13,844

12,619

Mother’s age at the time of childbirth

15–24

46.1

37.2

55.2

45.6

69,235

64,113

p <0.05

p <0.05

25–34

38.0

35.5

49.8

49.0

58,879

53,022

35–49

65.2

61.3

78.9

85.0

7418

6958

Birth order and interval

Birth order 1

46.6

35.7

55.1

42.6

50,438

46,563

p <0.05

p <0.05

Birth order-2/3 and interval ≤24

49.8

43.8

58.3

57.5

19,335

17,424

Birth order-2/3 and interval ≥24

29.2

25.4

40.1

34.9

43,911

39,842

Birth order-4+ and interval ≤24

82.5

96.5

105.7

126.6

6076

5835

Birth order-4+ and interval ≥24

47.5

44.8

60.8

64.9

15,392

14,051

Mother’s education

Illiterate

58.7

48.5

72.8

68.3

41,075

38,891

p <0.05

p <0.05

Literate

37.2

32.8

45.9

48.6

94,457

85,204

Father’s education

Illiterate

66.7

51.2

83.9

74.4

4211

4028

p <0.05

p <0.05

Literate

40.4

30.3

49.9

37.7

19,320

17,635

Mother’s occupation

Not working

43.8

32.3

54.9

42.4

18,345

16,837

p <0.05

p 0.05

Agricultural work

57.1

43.7

71.3

58.5

2908

2675

Professional work

34.6

30.5

38.9

41.9

1233

1165

Father’s occupation

Not working

42.9

45.1

59.4

68.9

1322

1226

p 0.05

p <0.05

Agricultural work

51.2

38.2

71.7

49.8

7075

6589

Skilled/Unskilled

47.9

37.3

52.4

50.1

7858

7259

Professional work

36.7

24.7

44.5

29.5

7277

6590

Mass media exposure

No exposure

58.6

49.8

71.8

69.2

36,909

34,939

p <0.05

p <0.05

Any exposure

38.2

33.0

47.5

41.0

98,624

89,156

Table 2

Estimated IMR and U5MR across parental social and economic characteristics

Social & Economic Characteristics

Estimated IMR per 1000 live births

Estimated U5MR per 1000 live birth

Sample Size

Significance

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

IMR

U5MR

Religion

Hindu

44.7

38.1

55.3

49.5

99,138

90,023

p 0.05

p 0.05

Non-Hindu

39.3

35.7

49.1

46.2

36,394

34,072

Caste

Scheduled castes (SCs)

50.1

40.0

62.4

53.3

25,965

24,130

p 0.05

p 0.05

Scheduled tribes (STs)

51.9

36.1

66.5

50.6

23,727

22,885

Other back- ward classes (OBCs)

43.1

40.9

53.7

52.1

54,708

49,139

Socio-economic status

Lower

61.6

51.1

75.5

70.1

34,712

32,987

p <0.05

p <0.05

Upper lower

51.9

42.2

62

58.3

30,595

28,816

Lower middle

40.7

37.9

52.3

44.4

26,838

23,903

Upper middle

30.0

28.2

41.0

32.6

23,037

21,120

Upper

22.0

17.4

24.9

20.8

20,349

17,268

Table 2 shows higher male IMR and U5MR in the different facets and facades of social, religious, and economic front as compared to female; and the difference seen among the various socio-economic groups has been significant.

Table 3

Estimated IMR and U5MR across environmental characteristics

Environmental Characteristics

Est, IMR per 1000 live birth

Est. U5MR per 1000 live birth

Sample Size

Significance

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

IMR

U5MR

Cooking fuel

Unsafe unhygienic

51.4

26.3

63.2

33.1

75,321

70,304

p <0.05

p <0.05

Safe hygienic

28.6

43.8

37.5

57.4

40,235

35,512

Drinking water

Unsafe

45.1

40.5

56.3

56.7

12,855

12,062

p 0.05

p 0.05

Safe

43.1

37.5

53.8

48.5

112,122

1,02,227

Housing

Urban

29.5

27.1

38.3

36.3

35,562

31,635

p <0.05

p <0.05

Rural

49.2

41.6

60.2

53.6

99,970

92,459

Region

North

36.1

36.5

45.1

45.8

25,908

22,807

p <0.05

p <0.05

Central

61.7

57.3

73.7

74.5

39,607

36,314

East

45.9

36.6

54.8

45.9

28,350

26,280

Northeast

45.7

37.4

54.1

47.3

18,832

17,733

West

31.1

22.4

37.9

30.1

9,445

8,585

South

26.9

21.0

41.4

29.9

13,389

12,377

India

43.3

37.9

51.4

47.8

135,532

124,094

All environmental parameters show significant association with higher male IMR and U5MR except the quality of drinking water (Table 3). Central Indian region reported highest IMR and U5MR among the male and female respectively.

Discussion

Elements and determinants of gender gaps in infant and under-five mortality in India have been studied and reflected in this work. As a whole IMR and U5MR reduced throughout the research period (2015-2016) compared to the past. While the difference between male and female IMR was 11.8 in 1992, the same was 10.8 per 1000 live births for U5MR. Currently, the difference between male and female IMR is 5.4 against 3.6 per 1000 live births for U5MR. 16 The rates have fallen considerably over the last decade. 13 The risk of mortality was revealed to be higher among male children; suggesting in support of the biological theory that portrays the disadvantages of male children clobbered with excess mortality culminating in the gender gap in child mortality in India.17, 18 The trend of gender gap in infant mortality appears to be the same across all over India; however, it has reflected some differences for under-five children.

Infant mortality among male children was higher than that of females in the context of maternal education, exposure to mass media, religion, caste status, cooking fuel, and residential origin. Studies in sub-Saharan countries documented insignificant differences in IMR due to gender differences; however, that indicated a higher risk of male under-five mortality perhaps due to genetic reasons.19 It has been reported in the past that genetic reasons often predispose a higher risk of mortality among male children as compared to females.20, 21

Certain socioeconomic traits appeared to have significant contribution to gender differences in infant and under-five mortality in India. Although variations exist between the survival chances of children of women with different socioeconomic characteristics, the same may not be the most conceivable deciding factor to cause the death of children of two sexes differentially. Differential treatment of children regarding food, nutrition, care, and medical attention within the family is unlikely even in the face of limited resources. Therefore, the gender gap in mortality can be explained based on genetic and biological reasons that place a girl child in an advantageous position compared to the boys.22

From 1992 (NFHS-1) to 2018 (NFHS-4) IMR and U5MR have reduced considerably with U5MR declining more than the IMR. Certain Indian states even attained SDG targets of child mortality beforehand; others are likely to follow shortly. 13 Male child attrition was higher than that of females in the early ’90s, but somehow got changed the reverse way later (NFHS-2 &3). The male child mortality reported to have upsurged comparatively in recent times (2018-19) because of the GOI campaign titled ‘Beti Bachao – Beti Padao’ and compulsive prohibition of pre-natal sex determination followed by sex-selective abortion. 13

IMR decreased identically for both sexes during 1992 to 2018 but the decline in male mortality was more than the female as regards U5MR. 5 Extraneous factors like exclusive breastfeeding, improved maternal nutrition, better child rearing, upgraded housing and sanitation, enhanced awareness of childhood immunization could have resulted in a favorable situation for the male children. The child caring for a son is all the more likely to be better than the girl child in patriarchal Indian communities – could be perhaps supportive of the survival trend.23 Belonging to lower social strata, scheduled class, and tribes resulted in higher mortality because of ignorance, poor awareness, and even aversion to access the health care provisions at the time of need. Although a high index of domestic hygiene, hygienic and sanitary wash-ups, clean cooking fuel, and safe water for drinking often stood pertinent for infant and child health;23 but not always showcased proportional and comparable decline of child mortality as such.

The peninsular India reflected lower rates of IMR and U5MR as compared to Central India, perhaps because the latter harbored the largest conglomeration of tribal and Indian aborigines – that could have been contributory.24, 25 Present work revealed that maternal attributes like education contributed considerably to child survival depicting lower IMR and U5MR among children belonging to mothers with baseline education; and the finding corroborates with the noting of the studies of recent past.26, 27 Childbirth in higher maternal age (35-49 years) with shortened birth interval had heightened risk of child mortality with increased IMR and U5MR in the present work; being supported by the observation of study from the past. 28 A baby girl of a poor uneducated mother stood a higher mortality risk during infancy. Similarly, maternal age, birth order & interval, and parental education were seen as significantly contributing to U5MR. The higher score in parental education was observed associated with lower mortality in children of both genders.

Strength and Limitations

The study used NFHS 4 data portraying the countrywide representation of both rural and urban populations from a variety of socio-economic strata. The observations perhaps appear appropriate for generalization to a certain extent, being population-based and applicable to the Indian context as such, thereby likely to throw light on the mortality differential of infants and children if further explored in depth. There is a general tendency in under-reporting of child death in South-East Asian countries which could alter the result and may not be a welcome notion. 29 Factors like pre-conceptional maternal health, nutrition, well-being, and morbidity state were neither counted nor considered for determining the cause of infant and child mortality, therefore factual indeterminacy continues to exist. Immunization, duration of exclusive breastfeeding, child feeding, and rearing practices were not taken into account nullifying their relatively high impact on child health and survival. The work only used secondary data on certain social, demographic, and economic factors to find their association with gender differential in IMR and U5MR which probably stand offering restricted universality of the findings in totality. An all-inclusive, comprehensive, and holistic approach to child survival may be resonating a better option for future intents.

Conclusion

Birth order, birth spacing, mother’s age at birth, maternal and parental education were found as valuable indicators of child survival in the family sphere. Birth order higher than 4 with birth-spacing less than 24 months for the mothers bearing children at 35 years of age and above could have a deleterious effect on child survival. Tracking expectant women with such a combination of attributes appears desirable for pursuing better child survival in the Indian community. High-risk zones of Central India need critical and decisive surveillance to control and prevent child mortality due to common avertible causes. Planning and implementation of health programs need to consider the gender gap in child mortality for maternal and child health-related policies and interventions.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

Sample Registration System Statistical Report. Office of Registrar General Census Commission India, Min. of Home Affair, Govt. of India2018https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/44374

2 

JR Speakman Sex- and age-related mortality profiles during famine: testing the 'body fat' hypothesisJ Biosoc Sci201345682340

3 

EE Steen K Kallen K Marsal M Norman L Hellstrom-Westas Impact of sex on perinatal mortality and morbidity in twinsJ Perinat Med201442222531

4 

L Alkema F Chao D You J Pedersen CC Sawyer National, regional, and global sex ratios of infant, child, and under-5 mortality and identification of countries with outlying ratios: a systematic assessmentLancet Glob Health20142952130

5 

C C Sawyer Child mortality estimation: Estimating sex differences in childhood mortality since the 1970sPLoS Med201298100128710.1371/journal.pmed.1001287

6 

A Zerai Preventive health strategies and infant survival in ZimbabweAfr Popul Stud19961112962

7 

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Sex Differentials in Childhood Mortality. UN publication, ST/ESA/SER.A/3142011https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/mortality/SexDifferentialsChildhoodMortality.pdf

8 

QH Chowdhury R Islam K Hossain Socio-economic determinants of neonatal, post-neonatal, infant and child mortalityInt J Soc Anthropol2010261185

9 

O Solar A Irwin A Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Social Determinants of Health2010https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241500852

10 

TAJ Houweling AE Kunst Socio-economic inequalities in child-hood mortality in low-and-middle-income countries: A review of the international evidenceBr Med Bull2010931726

11 

A Singh K Kumar AK Yadav K S James L Mcdougal Y Atmavilas Factors Influencing the Sex Ratio at Birth in India: A New Analysis based on Births Occurring between 2005 and 2016Stud Fam Plann20215214158

12 

IIPS and ICF. 2017. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4): 2015-16 India. Mumbai - IIPS. 20172017https://www.dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR339/FR339.pdf

13 

The Demographic and Health Survey Program. USAIDhttps://www.dhsprogram.com/data/Dataset-Types.cfm

14 

T K Roy A Chattopadhyay Daughter discrimination and future sex ratio at birth in IndiaAsian Popul Stud2012832819

15 

PM Kulkarni United Nations Population Fund. Sex Ratio at Birth in India: Recent Trends and Patterns. New Delhi: UNFPA2020https://india.unfpa.org/en/publications/sex-ratio-birth-india-recent-trends-and-patterns

16 

A Pal J Yadav D Kumari J Singh Gender differentials and risk of infant and under five mortality in India. A comparative survival analysisChildren Youth Ser Rev202011810547710.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105477

17 

AG Boco Individual and community-Level effects on child mortality: An analysis of 28 demographic and health surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa. Africa. 2010 In DHS Working Papers No. 73 (Ed.). Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF Macro2010https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/WP73/WP73.pdf

18 

M Bhatia M Ranjan P Dixit LK Dwivedi Mind the gap: Temporal trends in inequalities in infant and child mortality in India (1992–2016)SSM Popul Health20185201910.1016/j.ssmph.2018.05.001

19 

SA Adedini JO Akinyemi C Odimegwu A Stephen Sex differentials in childhood mortality revisited: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa2013https://iussp.org/sites/default/files/event_call_for_papers/IUSSP_Sex%20differentials%20in%20childhood%20mortality%20in%20SSA.pdf

20 

AM Basu Is discrimination in food really necessary for explaining sex differentials in childhood mortality?Popul Stud1989432193210

21 

PK Muhuri SH Preston Effects of family composition on mortality differentials by sex among children in Matlab, BangladeshPopul Dev Rev199117341534

22 

R Pongou Why is infant mortality higher in boys than in girls? A new hypothesis based on preconception environment and evidence from a large sample of twinsDemography201350242144

23 

DG Bassani P Jha N Dhingra R Kumar Child mortality from solid-fuel use in India: a nationally-representative case-control studyBMC Public Health201010149110.1186/1471-2458-10-491

24 

CZ Guilmoto N Saikia V Tamrakar JK Bora Excess under-5 female mortality across India: a spatial analysis using 2011 census dataLancet Glob Health2018666508

25 

JK Bora Factors explaining regional variation in under-five mortality in India: An evidence from NFHS-4Health Place20206410236310.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102363

26 

E Gakidou K Cowling R Lozano Cjl Murray Increased educational attainment and its effect on child mortality in 175 countries between 1970 and 2009: A systematic analysisLancet2010376974595974

27 

A Musafili B Essen C Baribwira A Binagwaho LA Persson KE Selling Trends and social differentials in child mortality in Rwanda 1990-2010: Results from three demographic and health surveysJ Epidemiol Community Health201569983440

28 

R Hong M Ruiz-Beltran Low birth weight as a risk factor for infant mortality in EgyptEast Mediterr Health J20081459921002

29 

G Yang J Hu KQ Rao J Ma C Rao AD Lopez Mortality registration and surveillance in China: History, current situation and challengesPopul Health Metr200531310.1186/1478-7954-3-3



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 28-10-2024

Accepted : 02-12-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.jchm.2024.034


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 54

PDF Downloaded: 6