Get Permission Inani: Role of cetrorelix in the prevention and treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A prospective case control study


Introduction

The most dangerous adverse effect of regulated ovarian stimulation is ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). 1, 2 3.6% and 0.1-2%, respectively, of IVF cycles result in moderate to severe OHSS. In OHSS there are two separate disease entities: early OHSS, which manifests 3-6 days following HCG triggering, and late OHSS, which manifests more than 10 days following HCG triggering.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Early OHSS is caused by exogenously administered HCG, which causes the granulosa cells to generate a sufficient amount of vasoactive chemicals over the course of three to seven days. Granulosa cell hyperactivity in late OHSS is caused by early pregnancy, as the implanting trophoblast releases more endogenous hCG.

The foundation of prevention is the prediction of OHSS, which is predicated on identifying risk factors for those who would be high responders based on ultrasonography and estradiol levels. Many stimulated follicles, asthenic habitus, many stimulated follicles, high serum estradiol, necklace sign, pregnancy, hCG luteal supplementation, GnRH agonist downregulating process, and high serum anti Mullerian hormone are high risk factors associated with OHSS. 10 In this study, we examined how patients undergoing early luteal phase IVF-ET responded to therapy with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).

Materials and Methods

In Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India, at the Index Medical College, Hospital & Research Center, a prospective case-control research was carried out. The study concentrated on 102 patients receiving controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) or in-vitro fertilization (IVF). The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix after ovum pick-up (OPU): the antagonist group (n=51) and the control group (n=51). Patients were given thorough descriptions of the study, and consent forms in English, Hindi, and written and informed consent were used to get signed for participation.11

Inclusion criteria

Patients who satisfied certain requirements were included in the study: they had to be between the ages of 25 and 45, have a BMI of no more than 35, be on both long- and short-term protocols, have had participants must be female, have PCOS and be at risk of OHSS, have a decent antral follicle count and be high responder patients with more than 10 retrieved oocytes.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusions from the trial were poor counts of antral follicles, AMH < 1.5, endometriosis, prior ovarian surgery, and refusal to provide permission.

Patients had thorough examinations and history. In order to rule out exclusion criteria, patients had regular blood tests, day 2 hormonal profiles, pelvic and abdominal examination, and basal ultrasound examinations performed prior to recruitment. Follicular monitoring was carried out for individuals undertaking the stimulation regimen by means of ultrasonography examination (Phillips ClearVue 350). Using lengthy or brief procedures determined by many factors such age, the number of antral follicles, and the hormonal profile, all cases were stimulated.

Leupride 0.5 mg gonadotropin injection (inj.) was begun on day 21 of the preceding cycle in the lengthy protocol. Following total desensitization, recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) was administered at 200–225 IU on day 2 of the stimulation cycle to start ovarian stimulation. Recombinant FSH and injectable Leupride were included into the short regimen on the second day of the stimulation cycle. Every three to five days, transvaginal ultrasonography was carried out to monitor follicular growth. After receiving 500 mcg of recombinant hCG, and after seeing two or more follicles with a diameter of at least 17 mm, oocyte retrieval was carried out 34–36 hours later.

Starting on the day of ovum pick-up, the study group was administered Cetrorelix 0.25 mg as a preventive measure for five days. Standard cautious and supportive OHSS management was given to the control group. As indicated in Table 1. 12, all OHSS patients had their diagnosis made in accordance with the usual categorization, which divided the condition into four categories: mild, moderate, severe, and critical OHSS.

Statistical analysis

The format for quantitative data is mean±SD. Version 20.0 of the IBM statistical program for the social sciences (SPSS) was used to analyze both quantitative and qualitative data. The data were analyzed using the independent t test and the Mann-Whitney U test. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Results

llustrates the classification of OHSS severity, with the antagonist group exhibiting a significantly higher prevalence of mild cases (42 vs. 23, p=0.01*). Demographic data in Table 2 shows no significant differences between the control and antagonist groups in age, BMI, infertility type, duration, or hormonal levels. However, the antagonist group had a higher incidence of ovarian causes of infertility (27 vs. 16, p=0.03*). Table 3 reveals a notable difference in the clinical outcome of OHSS, with the antagonist group demonstrating fewer cases of moderate and severe OHSS (p=0.03* and p=0.01*, respectively). In Table 4, the antagonist group exhibits a higher pregnancy rate compared to the control group (24 vs. 13, p=0.02*). Overall, GnRH antagonist administration post-OPU shows promise in mitigating OHSS severity and improving pregnancy outcomes.11, 12, 13, 14, 15

Table 1

Classification of OHSS.

MILD

Moderate

Severe

Critical

Bloating

Vomiting

Massive ascites

Tense ascites

Nausea

Abdominal pain

Hydrothorax

Hypoxemia

Abdominal distension

USG evidence of ascites

Hematocrit >45%

Pericardial effusion

Ovaries ≤5 cm

Hematocrit >41%

WBC count >15000/mm3

Hematocrit >55%

WBC count >10000/mm3

Oliguria

WBC count > 25000/mm3

Ovaries >5 cm

Creatinine 1-1.5 mg/dl

Oliguria/anuria

Creatinine clearance ≥50 ml/min

Creatinine >1.5 mg/dl

Hepatic dysfunction

Creatinine clearance <50 ml/min

Anasarca

Renal failure

Ovaries variably enlarged

Thromboembolic phenomena

Ovaries variably enlarged

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)

Table 2

Demographic data

Variable name

Control group (N=51)

Antagonist group (N=51)

P value

Age (year)

32.39±5.48

28.27±3.66

0.23 (NS)

BMI (kg/m2)

24.69±2.40

22.76±2.61

0.46 (NS)

Infertility – primary

36

37

0.82 (NS)

Secondary

15

14

Duration (year)

6.69±2.89

7.24±3.17

0.36 (NS)

Cause – tubal

16

10

0.17 (NS)

Ovarian

16

27

0.03*

Male

9

6

0.40 (NS)

Unexplained

10

8

0.60 (NS)

FSH (mIU/ml)

6.06±1.38

5.76±1.38

0.27 (NS)

LH (mIU/ml)

5.27±1.79

4.98±1.66

0.40 (NS)

PCO (no. of patients)

18

24

0.31 (NS)

Long protocol

22

24

Short protocol

29

27

Table 3

Clinical outcome of the OHSS.

Final diagnosis

Control group

Antagonist group

P value

Mild

23

42

0.01*

Moderate

18

08

0.03*

Severe

10

01

0.01*

Critical

0

0

Table 4

Pregnancy rate

Variable

Control group

Antagonist group

P value

Pregnancy rate (chemical and clinical)

13

24

0.02*

Discussion

Similar to our work, Chen et al.'s retrospective investigation demonstrated that administering Cetrorelix in the early luteal phase can decrease the incidence of moderate and severe OHSS as well as the occurrence of OHSS. Thirteen Cetrorelix was administered 0.25 mg for three days as part of a lengthy agonist protocol in the trial. Cetrorelix was administered for five days in both long and short protocols as part of our prospective trial. Similar to our analysis, the prior research found that antagonist groups had a higher incidence of moderate forms and a lower incidence of severe forms. The Cetrorelix dosage and duration utilized in our study aid in the treatment and prevention of OHSS. Our research demonstrates unique crucial standards that none of the patients meet.

According to a Lainas et al. study, Ganirelix was administered to PCOS patients who had undergone an antagonist protocol but had developed severe early on hand symptoms of OHSS.10 In our study, high-risk OHSS patients received Cetrorelix beginning on the day of ovum collection, using both lengthy and short regimens. Cetrorelix prevents and cures OHSS since the antagonist group had a noticeably greater frequency of moderate manifestations of the condition.

In a prior study, it was observed that 40 patients who were diagnosed with severe OHSS on day 5 following OPU and who were administered GnRH antagonists from day 5 to day 8 following OPU had decreased OHSS.16 Wang et al. conducted a study which demonstrated that administering a GnRH antagonist for seven days starting on the day of OPU effectively prevented the progression of mild to moderate and severe OHSS.17 Only one patient in the antagonist group experienced severe OHSS in our study, indicating that cetrorelix has prevented mild to moderate and severe OHSS. There is a clinical spectrum for OHSS. On one end of the spectrum, some patients have minor symptoms, while others need intensive care and may even be at risk of dying from the illness.18, 19, 20, 21, 22

OHSS is brought on by increased vascular permeability, which is caused by vascular endothelial growth factor, or VEGF. Theca and granulosa cells secrete VEGF in the late follicular phase. Increased vascular permeability brought on by VEGF oversecretion is the cause of OHSS. The amount of free VEGF is correlated with the severity of OHSS. The suppression of VEGF is the reason for the increase in vascular permeability.23, 24 The GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix, which is employed in this investigation, has been shown to reduce VEGF expression in hyperstimulated ovaries and VEGF secretions in human granulosa lutein cell cultures.25 In the ovaries of hyperstimulated rats, GnRH antagonist treatment also decreased VEGF and VEGF receptor expression at the mRNA and protein levels.26 A luteolytic effect—a method of lessening the excessive synthesis of vasoactive cytokines from the corpora lutea that contributes to the development of OHSS—is reported to be present in GnRH antagonists.9, 27

The administration of GnRH antagonists during the peri-implantation period may raise concerns regarding potential negative effects on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, according to a previous study by Bosch et al.28 In a prospective cohort study involving 192 IVF patients who were at risk of OHSS, Lainas et al. found that luteal GnRH antagonist administration had no negative effects on pregnancy or neonatal outcomes. 16 According to certain research, there is no connection between GnRH antagonists and pregnancy or unfavorable birth outcomes. 9, 16, 27, 29, 30 Administration of GnRH antagonists during the luteal phase did not affect the likelihood of pregnancy in a prior study.29 The antagonist group in our study had higher biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates. It should be mentioned that women with early OHSS had much higher biochemical pregnancy rates than non-OHSS patients in a prior study by Papanikolaou et al.31

Conclusion

Cetrorelix, which is given during the early luteal phase of the ovulation stimulation cycle in IVF, under long and short protocols, is a safe and effective medicine to prevent and cure OHSS. The frequency of moderate and severe OHSS may decrease as a result.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

Y Abramov U Elchalal JG Schenker An epidemic of severe OHSS; a price we have to pay?Hum Reprod199914921813

2 

A Marzal H Holzer T Tulandi Future developments to minimize ART risksSemin Reprod Med20123015260

3 

CA Lyons CA Wheeler GN Frishman RJ Hackett DB Seifer Haning RV, early and late resentation of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: two distinct entities with different risk factorsHum Reprod199495792801

4 

RS Mathur AV Akande SD Keay LP Hunt JM Jenkins Distinction between early and late ovarian hyperstimulation syndromeFertil Steril20007359017

5 

E G Papanikolaou H Tournaye W Verpoest M Camus V Vernaeve V Steirteghem A Early and late ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: Early pregnancy outcome and profileHum Reprod200520363677

6 

W Xing H Lin Y Li D Yang W Wang Q Zhang Is the GnRH Antagonist Protocol Effective at Preventing OHSS for Potentially High Responders Undergoing IVF/ICSIPLoS One20151010140286

7 

VV Mishra PH Rane SR Aggarwal Role of cetrorelix in the prevention and treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a prospective case control studyInt J Reproduction, Contraception, Obstet Gynecol20131211508

8 

G Griesinger R Felberbaum K Diedrich GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation: a treatment regimen of clinicians’ second choice data from the German national IVF registryHum Reprod200520923735

9 

UM Fouda AM Sayed HS Elshaer BE Hammad MM Shaban KA Elsetohy GnRH antagonist rescue protocol combined with cabergoline versus cabergoline alone in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a randomized controlled trialJ Ovarian Res201692910.1186/s13048-016-0237-8

10 

T Lainas I Sfontouris I Zorzovilis G Petsas G Lainas E Kolibianakis Management of severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by reinitiation of GnRH antagonistReprod Biomed Online200715440820

11 

M J Levy W Ledger E M Kolibianakis P C Ijzermanboon K Gordon

12 

D Navot PA Bergh N Laufer Ovarian Hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: Prevention and treatmentFertil Steril199258224961

13 

Z Levine I Berin D Gardner A Weissman C Howles Z Shoham Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques: Volume 2: clinical perspectivesCRC PressNewYork201882059

14 

G Lainas E Kolibianakis I Sfontouris I Zorzovilis G Petsas T Lainas Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following luteal GnRH antagonist administration in patients with severe early OHSSHum Reprod2013287192971

15 

EG Papanikolaou H Tournaye W Verpoest M Camus V Vernaeve V Steirteghem Early and late ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: early pregnancy outcome and profileHum Reprod200520363677

16 

C Chen L Liu Y Geng C Yang T Li Y Gao Prevention and treatment of OHSS by administration of GnRH antagonist in the early luteal phase of controlled ovarioan hyperstimulation cyclesInt J Clin Exp Pathol20171022193201

17 

GT Lainas EM Kolibianakis IA Sfontouris IZ Zorzovilis GK Petsas TB Tarlatzi Outpatient management of severe early OHSS by administration of GnRH antagonist in luteal phase: an observational cohort studyReprod Biol Endocrinol2012106971

18 

P Wang XF Ling XL Li Y Lu Y Su J Zhang Application of gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist in the prevention and treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndromeChin J Clinicians20137858491

19 

M Moses H Bogowsky E Anteby B Lunenfeld E Rabau DM Serr Thromboembolic phenomena after ovarian stimulation with menopausal gonadotropinsLancet19652742412135

20 

J Esteban-Altirriba Le syndrome d’hyperstimulation massive des ovariesRev Fr Gynecol Obstet196156555

21 

PF Cases Reaccionovaricamonstruosa a las gonadotrofinas a proposito de un caso fatalAnn Cirug195823116

22 

AD Cluroe BJ Synek A fatal case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with cerebral infarctionPathology199527434450

23 

S Semba T Moriya EM Youssef H Sasano An autopsy case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with massive pulmonary edema and pleural effusionPathol Int200050754952

24 

JA Garcia-Velasco How to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a new indication for dopamine agonistsInt J Reprod Biomed2009182716

25 

LC Ajonuma Is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) the main mediator in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)Med Hypotheses2008706117482

26 

B Asimakopoulos N Nikolettos B Nehls K Diedrich S Al-Hasani E Metzen Gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists did not influence the secretion of steroid hormones but affect the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor from human granulose leutinized cell culturesFertil Steril200686363677

27 

PD Taylor SG Hillier HM Fraser Effects of GnRH antagonist treatment on follicular development and angiogenesis in the primate ovaryJ Endocrinol20041831117

28 

TG Lainas IA Sfontouris IZ Zorzovilis GK Petsas GT Lainas E Alexopoulou Live births after management of severe OHSS by GnRH antagonist administration in the luteal phaseReprod Biomed Online200919678995

29 

E Bosch I Valencia E Escudero J Crespo C Simon J Remohi Premature luteinization during gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist cycles and its relationship with in vitro fertilization outcomeFertil Steril2003806144453

30 

TG Lainas IA Sfontouris IZ Zorzovilis GK Petsas GT Lainas GS Iliadis Management of severe OHSS using GnRH antagonist and blastocyst cryopreservation in PCOS patients treated with long protocolInt J Reprod Biomed20091811520

31 

M Eftekhar S Miraj Z Mortazavifar The effect of luteal phase gonadotropin- releasing hormone antagonist administration on IVF outcomes in women at risk of OHSSInt J Reprod Bio Med201614850717



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 18-11-2023

Accepted : 18-12-2023


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jchm.2023.030


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 850

PDF Downloaded: 259