Get Permission Patel and Patel: Study on gender preference among pregnant women attending the tertiary care Hospital Valsad: A cross-sectional study


Introduction

In India, female infanticide has been practiced for centuries with the earliest evidence being provided by Sir Jonathan Duncan in 1789.1 With the availability of new technology, the bias suffered by females from birth to the grave is being extended to womb to tomb.

Desire for male child manifests so blatantly that parents have no qualms about repeated, closely spaced pregnancies, premature deaths and even terminating child before it is born. Birth of female child is perceived as a curse with economic and social liability.2

On the basis of census 2001, the united nations children fund states that systemic gender discrimination has resulted in up to 50 million girl and women “going missing” from India’s population.3, 4

Sex ratio, an important social indicator measuring extent of prevailing equity between males and females in society, is defined as number of females /1000 males. Changes in sex ratio reflect underlying socioeconomic, cultural patterns of a society. As per National Family Health survey-5 Sex ratio at birth for children born in the last five years in India is 929/1000 males5 while of Gujarat is 955 Female per 1000 males with improvement over NFHS-4(906/1000 males).6

There is a strong preference for sons in many societies. This is now being actualized by using the technology of Sonographic scans, amniotic fluid examination etc. to detect the sex of a fetus and abort female fetuses. Moreover, there seems to be a strong avoidance of daughters, especially after one daughter.7 Detailed analysis of surveys data have revealed that the sex ratio at the second birth for couples who already have a daughter is much lower than for those whose first child is son.8

The social evil female feticide and infanticide can be eradicated only when we identify the reasons of gender preference and recognize the importance of women in their life.

Therefore the present study will be conducted among pregnant mother attending OPD of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department of our institute to find out gender preference and underlying reasons for gender preference among them.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out among pregnant women attending the ANC Clinic of GMERS hospital, Valsad. The study was carried out during July-August 2021 for the period of two months. Total 100 Antenatal mothers are interviewed during study period. Written consent of participation is obtaining in local language from the ANC mother attending the Antenatal care outpatient department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology department at our institute. Intern doctor posted in Community Medicine department are trained for data collection a day before piloting of study, Initial piloting was done to find out the response for the same using predesigned proforma by trained intern doctor under supervision. No changes have been made in proforma after piloting. With maintaining the privacy and confidentiality Information was collected by interview method using Predesigned, semi-structured questionnaire to collect the relevant information pertaining to study variables such as name, age, educational status, type of family, Obstetric history, number of children, reasons for gender preference and their knowledge and attitude regarding gender preference.

As sex selective behavior is widely prevalent during child birth and which is responsible for adverse sex ratio in society so this study was conducted to know the reasons or factors responsible for gender preference among pregnant mother. Data was entered in MS excel 2010 and analysed by appropriate statistical software. Appropriate statistical test may use when needed.

Exclusion criteria

Those pregnant mothers not giving consent, those having medical emergency and Primigravida pregnant mother were excluded from this study.

Result

Table 1

Demographic profile of pregnant mother (n=100)

A. Age wise distribution of pregnant women

Age group

Number

Percentage

16-20

08

8.00

21-25

51

51.00

26-30

34

34.00

31-35

07

7.00

B. Cast wise distribution

Cast

Number

Percentage

SC

07

7.00

ST

17

17.00

OBC

18

18.00

GENERAL

58

58.00

C. Pregnant women’s educational status

Education

Number

Percentage

Illiterate

15

15.00

Primary School

35

35.00

Secondary School

30

30.00

Higher secondary

14

14.00

Graduate

06

6.00

D. Type of Family

Types of family

Number

Percentages

Nuclear

51

51.00

Joint

28

28.00

Three generation

21

21.00

Table 1 Showed that half of the (51.0%) pregnant women are 21-25 years of age group and 34.0% are 26-30 years of age. Even study district is belong to tribal district (58.0%) of pregnant are of general category while rest are Schedule Tribe, Schedule cast and OBC (42.0%) (Table 1), of this 51.0% belong to Nuclear family and 28.0% belong to joint family. Gender preference may affect by above demographic factors.

Graph 1

Distribution of patient on the basis of gender preference for current pregnancy

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/fb68c0f9-634a-4f66-8097-c4d4e7d805ceimage1.png

Figure 1 Show that out of 100 pregnant women 38.0% of pregnant mother had no gender preference for current pregnancy, while 40.0% and 22.0% pregnant mother had preference for male child and female child respectively.

Table 2

Reasons for male gender preference (N=40) multiple responses

Reasons

Number

Percentages

Income purpose

23

57.50

For generation constitution

18

45.00

For security in old age life

08

20.00

As social status symbol

01

2.50

Previous child is female

24

60.00

Demand of In-laws

18

45.00

Demand of Husband

15

37.50

Others

02

5.00

[i] *Multiple responses

Table 2 Showed various reasons for male gender preference for current pregnancy and we noted that 60.0% women had female child, 57.50% said for income purpose, 45.00% said for generation constitution, 45.00% said demand of in laws, 37.50% demand of husband 20% prefer for security in old age life and 2.50% said male child is status symbol in society.

Table 3

Reasons for female gender preference (n=22) multiple responses

Reasons

Number

Percentages

Like for girl child

05

22.73

More loving and caring for parents & family

03

13.64

Daughter helps in household works

02

09.09

Demand of Family

04

18.18

Previous child is male

18

81.82

Table 3 Shows the reasons for female gender preference and found that 81.82% said that they have previous male child, 22.73% like the girl child, 18.18 % said demand of family, 13.64% said daughter are more loving and caring to family and 9.09% said daughter helps in household works.

Table 4

Reasons for non-preference of female child (n=40)

Reasons

Number

Percentages

Dowary problem

02

5.00

Marriage related problem

02

5.00

Not staying with parents after marriage

03

7.50

Already having a girl child

35

87.50

Others

01

2.50

Above table showed that reasons for non-preference of female child and noted that 87.50% mothers already have a girl child, 5% said dowry problem, 5% believe that marriage related problems 7.5% said not staying with parents after marriage and family pressure (2.5%).

Discussion

Gender preferences are a well-known behaviour of human society. A couple’s gender preference for children is usually influenced by their traditional background and cultural practices which has been handed over from generations. Wide differences in gender preferences exist in both developed as well as developing countries of the world and this may responsible for adverse sex ratio as well. So this study was conducted to know the gender preference among pregnant women attending the hospital.

In Present study 51.0% pregnant women was 21-25 years of age group and 34.0% was 26-30 years of age. Even the study district is belong to tribal district 58.0% of pregnant are of general category while rest are Schedule Tribe, Schedule cast and OBC (42.0%). 51.0% pregnant mothers was belong to Nuclear family and 28.0% belong to joint family.

A study conducted by Pavithra M.B 9 in urban slum of Bengaluru showed that Most of the pregnant women were in the age group of 21-25 years (65%).There were 12.0% women in the age group of 18-20 years and 19.0% in the 26-30 years group, whereas 4.% women were above 30 years of age.

A study conducted by Dr. B. Sailaja Suresh Kumar 10 among Antenatal Women in Visakhapatnam City found that majority of women (83.0%) belong to age group 21-30 years of age which is similar to our study. They also reported that 36% of women were Nuclear family, 32% were from Joint family and 32% from three generation family. Kumar Nithin at el11 reported that 77.3% of women were in age group 21-30 years with mean age 27.2 ± 4.1 years. Gender preference among mother may influence by type of family they reside.

In present study we noted 38.0% of pregnant mother had no gender preference and 62.0% had either type of gender preference for current pregnancy, of this 40.0% had male child preference and 22.0% pregnant mother had female child preference.

Dr. B. Sailaja Suresh Kumar10 in their study reported that majority of the mothers (73%) did not have any preference whereas 27 % preferred male child in the present pregnancy. Similarly Kumar Nithin at el.11 reported that majority of the antenatal women (60.6%) did not have any gender preferences. Among those who had a gender preference (39.4%), male and female preference was reported by 55.7% and 44.3% of the participants respectively. A Study conducted in Beed, Maharashtra showed the male preference to be 35%.12

Archak Roy13 in their study seen that the preference for boys is the highest in the scheduled caste community followed by the other backward class community. Also, the preference for girls was the lowest in the general category followed by the scheduled caste community. This association was found to be statistically significant with a p-value of <0.001. In this study we noted the reasons for male gender preference for current pregnancy and we found that 60.0% mother had already female child, 57.50% said male child preference for income purpose, 45.00% said for generation constitution, 45.00% said demand of in laws, 37.50% demand of husband and 2.50% said having male child is status of symbol in society. BN Vadera et al.14 A KAP study on gender preference and female feticide among pregnant mother showed that 58.5% gave preference to male child; the major reasons for this being social responsibilities are carried out by males (42.5%), for propagation of family name (23%), dependable in the old age (16%), pressure from family (11%), to perform cremation (4%), dowry (3%) and females are economic liability (3%). In study conducted by Pavithra M.B.9 the major reasons for this being for propagation of family name (52%), sons take care of parents in old age (23%), for lighting the pyre and performing cremation (6%), dowry (21%) and females are economic liability (9%). Pressure from other family members were given as a reason by 19% of women.

Vinod Vedpathak12 et al. in their study showed 294 (35%) of pregnant women gave preference to male child. Amongst stated reason for their male child preferences were multiple including e.g. propagation of family 208 (70.75%), Old age dependence 195 (66.33%), dowry etc. In present study we noted the reasons for non-preference of female child and 87.50% mother gave the reason that they already have a girl child, 5.0% said dowry problem, 5.0 % believe that marriage related problems 7.5% said female child is not staying with parents after marriage and 2.5% had family pressure for male child. Vinod Vedpathak et al.12 noted that preference to male child was significantly associated with education of mother, socioeconomic class and sex of the last child whereas insignificant association with religion and gravida of women. Archak Roy13, 14 also showed the association between gender preference and the sex of the last child in the current pregnancy was found to be statistically significant.

Conclusion

Having male child is more commonly a family’s preference and seen in families with at least one girl child. While following the present trend of small family with couples having two or only one child, a family is considered complete only when couples have at least one male child. This concept is found to be the underlying reason for preference of male child in majority of the cases. Study revealed that residential area and sex of the previous child affect a woman’s preference for her next child, while education increases awareness regarding the consequences of adverse sex ratio.

Recommendation

India is facing a demographic nightmare in terms of gender imbalance where skewed sex ratio is an issue of major concern and has long term social and demographic consequences. So community based awareness regarding gender preference and female feticide is very vital, thus strong campaign across all sections of the society raising concern for “saving the girl child” is advocated.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Hospital superintend for permitting us to conduct this study and for their support. We are thankful to intern doctor posted in community medicine department who involved in this study. We are also thankful to all pregnant women for their participation in this study without whom this study may not be possible.

References

1 

K B Pakrasi A Haldar Sex ratios and sex sequences of births in IndiaJ Biosoc Sci19713432764

2 

T Kanitkar M Mistry Status of women in India- an interstate comparisonIndian J Soc Work2000843814

3 

Female foeticide in India. C2007. Available fromhttp://www.unicef.org/india/media_3285.htm

4 

4.Census Figures of 2001. Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, New Delhi, India.New Delhi, Indiahttps://censusindia.net/

5 

National Family Health Survey-5 (2019-2020), Compendium of Fact Sheet, India and 14 States/ UTs (Phase-II), India- Key Indicators2019http://rchiips.org/nfhs/factsheet_NFHS-5.shtml)

6 

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. 2021. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), India, 2019-20: State Fact sheet Gujarat.201939http://rchiips.org/nfhs/NFHS-5_FCTS/Gujarat.pdf

7 

S Garg A Nath Female feticide in India: Issues and concernsJ Postgrad Med200854427685

8 

P Kulkarni India's child sex ratio: worsening imbalanceIndian J Med Ethics2012921126

9 

M B Pavithra S Dhanpal Hamsa Lokanath 3 A study of gender preference, knowledge and attitude regarding prenatal diagnostic techniques act among pregnant women in an urban slum ofBengaluru Int J Commun Med Public Health2015232827

10 

S Suresh PG Kumar A Study on Gender Preference and Awareness on Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act Among Antenatal Women in Visakhapatnam CityJ Dent Med Sci20151451069

11 

K K Nithin B Tanuj M Rekha Reddy Samskruthi3 Gender preferences among antenatal women: a cross-sectional study from coastal South India African Health SciencesAfr Health Sci20151525606

12 

V Vedpathak V Kakrani A Nagaonkar D Deo P Dahire Umesh Kawalkar Gender preference and awareness regarding sex determination among pregnant women- a hospital based studyInt J Med Sci Public Health20131525606

13 

A Roy R Biswas A Study on Gender Preference and Awareness Regarding Prenatal Sex Determination among Antenatal Women in a Rural Area of Darjeeling District, West BengalInt J Med Sci Public Health20174258

14 

B N Vadera BS Yadav SV Unadakat Sudha Yadav Study on Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Regarding Gender Preference and Female Feticide Among Pregnant Women IndianJ Commun Med20073243001



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 16-08-2022

Accepted : 22-08-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jchm.2022.026


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 675

PDF Downloaded: 186